jump to navigation

Its necessary to eliminate the middle man. March 20, 2007

Posted by Abby in Government, Public Interest, social entrepreneur.

In many cooperations these days, to save money, they choose to outsource. I found an example where outsourcing, in fact, harms the goal.

The US Embassy in an African country had a project. Every year, the US Ambassador is given a certain amount of money to put forward to a cause of his choice. I’m not sure of the specifics, but let’s say the amount was $15,000. At a meeting, the people who usually handles this says that they would like to contact some people they’d worked with before who specialize in ‘grading’ a charity and calculating its needs. To have this meeting with these people, they would have to fly them to the country, have them stay in a hotel, and hold the discussion over a day or twowith lunch and dinner. This could come to maybe $8,000 if not more.

One officer, however, decided that it wasn’t necessary to use this company at such a cost. Why not instead, look himself. So there was a school in great need in the area. This officer researched, and found that several schools in the United States were upgrading their computers, and throwing away perfectly good ones. He asked for them – practically free! Then he talked to the US Postal Service about how they might transport them to Africa – for a charity. If the school waited for a month, they said, it could be transported for free out of good will, as there was another shipment that would be travelling at the same time and had room for the computers. The schools needed internet, with little negotiation, the local phone company was willing to give the school a low monthly rate for access.

After computers, and internet – it still left most of the money. The school itself was run by nuns, so the Embassy asked who were the most needy children – these were quite obvious in the bunch. The Embassy paid for each child’s school tuition for the year, then purchased uniforms for each of them. They also gave the school enough money to provide a small meal for these children when they arrived at in the morning. Many children have to walk several miles, and because their families are so poor, they can’t afford to have breakfast, and their only meal everyday may be the lunch provided at school. This lack of food affects their concentration and motivation.

After all this – they were also able to build a small building to expand the school. How far money can really go if a single person puts in some effort – and it was by no means alone, the school was able to provide a lot of extra information too, as to where the money should go. Its amazing to think how closed minded some can be…



1. silviamocanu07 - March 21, 2007

In my opinion, with many charities the donations do not directly benefit those in need or the process of reaching the needy in very lengthy. Excessive bureaucracy is the main cause of this in my opinion, in addition to corruption.

In order to alleviate this problem, I agree with Abby that the best solution is to simplify the process and reduce the number of people involved. This would not only make the process faster, but it would also ensure the money or donations indeed reach those who need it the most.

2. Meg - March 21, 2007

I like the example you gave, Abby, and it’s wonderful to see that donations went to the actual cause for which this leader advocated. In certain cases, though, as the book describes, organizational advancement and cost-cutting strategies can offer the middle manager creative opportunities while benefitting the organization as a whole. In many current situations, particularly in the United States, where middle management careers have been outsourced or taken over by e-business systems, it’s good to know that it’s possible to give those who hold this position job security by slightly altering their tasks.

3. Brian Mulligan - April 1, 2007

Abby’s example was great. I really liked how far a dollar could go if a person invested a little bit more time. I really enjoy those stories about people doing great things for other people.

Cutting out the middle man in this situation is saving money and I agree with Meg about how middle management can be utilized to save money.

4. Jordi - April 12, 2007


How did you learn about this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: